“Dune: Part Two” has been released worldwide and is drawing praise from fans of all ages. Helmed by the visionary Dennis Villeneuve, the movie picks up right from where it left in 2021. It chronicles the rise of Paul Atreides and his journey in the unforgiving sand of Arrakis.
The movie is based on the novel “Dune” by the visionary Frank Herbert, published in 1965. It is not an easy job to adapt such a vast story on the screen, but Villeneuve did a fantastic one with the story. While the film has stunned audiences with its awe-inspiring visuals and powerful performances, the creative liberty taken with the source material has become a flashpoint of contention.
Dune: Part Two Director Didn’t Want to Hire Dave Bautista in One of the Biggest Movies of His Career
The Timeline of Dune: Part Two Was Highly Compressed In Comparison To The Books
Dune: Part Two had some significant changes in comparison to its source material by Frank Herbert. Most of the changes in the story were due to one reason – the fast pace of the movie. In the novel, the events were spread across at least a couple of years.
In the movie, however, the complete epic took place in a matter of months. This was perhaps important to adapt the novel into live-action. In a recent interview with Den of Geek, the director Dennis Villeneuve credited “momentum” as the reason behind the fast pace of the movie.
“Pressure to feel that the character was running against time, and that the world was eroding under his feet quickly. To give him less time to have a grip on reality, and create more feelings of danger around him. He will not have the time to install himself in the culture; he will not have time to absolutely gain the trust of all the Fremen. I did that just to put Paul more on edge. That was the main idea.” Dennis Villeneuve to Den of Geek
Beyond the compression of the timeline, Dune: Part Two also tweaked other major aspects of the story.
How is Dune 2 Different From The Book?
Dune 2 is an almost faithful adaptation of the saga with a few tweaks here and there.
- First of all, the movie removes the time jump in the book. Paul Atreides’ rise among the Fermen, his relationship with Chani, his transition to a religious leader, and the overall politics took more than two years in the book. In the movie, however, it was all a matter of months.
- In the novel, Chani and Atreides have had the time to explore their relationship and even have a son, who was left out in the movie. However, their son’s tragic fate could have been very emotional for the live-action, had it been included.
- Atreides’ sister Alia Atreides was in the womb of Lady Jessica in Dune: Part Two. In the novel, however, she was born as a mature kid and was two years old by the end of the story.
- Baron Harkonnen was perhaps the main antagonist of the story. While he was killed by Paul Atreides in the movie, it was Alia who slayed Harkonnen in the novel.
- In the movie, Chani is more than just an ally to Atreides. Not only is she tied to the Lisan Al Gaib Prophecy, but she is also one of the characters who does not believe in the idea of a messianic figure.
- Some major characters from the novel like Harrah, Count Fenring, and Thufir Hawat were missing from Dune: Part Two.
- Dennis Villeneuve made the story revolve mostly around Bene Gesserit leaving little scope for the Mentats or the Spacing Guild. This is because the director wanted “the Bene Gesserit to be at the center of the epicenter of this adaptation. It’s one of the things I feel is the most accurate with our time.”
There were a few more minor differences between the epic novel and the blockbuster movie. However, fans understand that these alterations might have been necessary to adapt the story.
