“I had to be where I had to be”: Emma Watson Had to Dispel ‘Demanding’ Rumors After Turning Down Barbie Star Ryan Gosling in $447M Oscar Nominated Movie

Emma Watson Had to Dispel 'Demanding' Rumors After Turning Down Barbie Star Ryan Gosling in $447M Oscar Nominated Movie
Advertisement

Damien Chazelle’s La La Land continues to be one of Emma Stone’s most spellbinding performances and perhaps one of the most delightful musicals ever made. And although Greta Gerwig’s Barbie has rightfully deserved the status of Ryan Gosling’s magnum opus, the 2016 musical marked nothing short of a vertex of his acting career. But before Stone landed her dazzling Oscar for Best Actress and the movie became a classic that fans never tire of revisiting, there had been an entirely different Emma attached to the project.

Featured Video
La La Land
La La Land (2016)

See also: “It’s so special to me”: Emma Stone Confessed Her True Feelings for Ryan Gosling After Being Asked if Barbie Star Was Better Kisser Than Ex-Boyfriend Andrew Garfield

Advertisement

Emma Watson Addressed the La La Land Controversy

It was indeed Emma Watson who had been slated to portray the dreamy Mia in the musical that ultimately ended up starring Emma Stone. Rumors at the time, however, cast the Harry Potter star in a rather sordid light, deeming her apparently “demanding” attitude the primary reason why Stone bagged the project in lieu. And although the English actress didn’t react to any such tabloid nonsense then, she did go on to debunk said rumors a year or so later during her appearance on SiriusXM.

Emma Watson
Emma Watson

“It’s one of these frustrating things where sort of names get attached to projects very early on as a way to kind of build anticipation or excitement for something that’s coming before anything is really actually agreed or set in stone.” 

In reality, her reportedly domineering nature wasn’t the culprit behind her turning down Chazelle’s award-winning hit, it was actually her prior commitment to another musical that left her with no other choice but to extricate herself from the former.

Advertisement

See also: “I probably would have been public enemy number one”: Emma Watson Was Afraid of the Consequences of Quitting Harry Potter

She Had Her Hands Full With Beauty and the Beast 

Watson, 33, had already been aboard Disney’s Beauty and the Beast long before she was offered to lead La La Land. All the horse training coupled with singing and dancing lessons that she was to devote herself to for the former, the Little Women star thus didn’t dare entertain the idea of taking over yet another high-profile project, one that inevitably demanded just as much, if not more, from her.

Advertisement

“This wasn’t a movie I could just kind of parachute into. I knew I had to do the work, and I had to be where I had to be. So scheduling conflict-wise, it just didn’t work out.”

Beauty and the Beast
Beauty and the Beast (2017)

See also: After Beauty and the Beast, Emma Watson Allegedly Killed Another $182M Disney Live Action Remake as it Was Too ‘Candy-Coated’

Before the Cruella star and Ryan Gosling‘s chemistry won millions of hearts all over the globe, Watson and Miles Teller had been in the works to depict the love-struck duo in the romance musical. And much like his female co-star, the Top Gun: Maverick star was also said to have excessively high demands (he allegedly wanted $2 million more than what he was being offered), the reported neglection of which ultimately led him to reject the movie.

Advertisement

But alas, everything ended up working out for the best.

La La Land can be streamed on Netflix and Beauty and the Beast is available for streaming on Disney+.

Advertisement

Source: SiriusXM [via Vanity Fair]

Avatar

Written by Khushi Shah

With a prolific knowledge of everything pop culture and a strong penchant for writing, Khushi has penned over 600 articles during her time as an author at FandomWire.
An abnormal psychology student and an avid reader of dark fiction, her most trusted soldiers are coffee and a good book.