Scientifically Inaccurate $474M Dwayne Johnson Movie Makes Bruce Willis’ Armageddon Look Like Interstellar

Inaccuracies in San Andreas included portraying the Earth as a constantly quivering jelly

Scientifically Inaccurate $474M Dwayne Johnson Movie Makes Bruce Willis’ Armageddon Look Like Interstellar

SUMMARY

  • Filmmakers often focus on entertainment value in disaster narratives
  • San Andreas and Armageddon were deemed inaccurate from a scientific perspective
  • Nolan consulted with actual theoretical physicists and scientists to ensure scientific accuracy in Interstellar
Show More
Featured Video

Filmmakers often stray from scientific truth in their disaster narratives to produce exciting, action-packed scenes. Certain films, like the science fiction disaster San Andreas starring Dwayne Johnson and Bruce Willis’ Armageddon, focus more on entertainment value, while others, like Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar, strive for scientific accuracy. 

Advertisement

However, from a scientific perspective, the films directed by Johnson and Willis were deemed to be inaccurate. Still, if compared to Armageddon, some aspects of Johnson’s San Andreas were even worse, making the former seem like the $703.2 scientifically realistic Interstellar

Brad Peyton directed the Warner Bros. film, which told the story of a massive earthquake that occurred due to the San Andreas Fault. Nolan, however, made sure that Interstellar adhered as closely as possible to scientific truth by consulting with actual theoretical physicists and scientists.

Advertisement
Dwayne Johnson in San Andreas
Dwayne Johnson in San Andreas

Also Read: Dwayne Johnson, Who Preaches About Fitness, May Have Already Earned More Than $1B in Alcohol Sales

Dwayne Johnson’s San Andreas Inaccuracies Make Armageddon Look Like Interstellar?

In Brad Peyton’s film San Andreas, a series of devastating earthquakes along the San Andreas Fault were shown. The Dwayne Johnson starrer movie significantly changed what would happen if such an event occurred, despite the amazing visual effects. Among the most egregious errors was the depiction of the Earth as a constantly quivering jelly that defied the laws of physics. 

On the other hand, Interstellar sought to portray space and time distortion in a way that was consistent with science. Science-fiction space opera, a genre that is sometimes specialized and contentious, saw great success with Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar. The film offered a gratifying and poignant journey while delving into incredibly intricate theoretical concepts.

Advertisement
Interstellar
Interstellar

In the Michael Bay film Armageddon, a group of oil drillers tried to destroy an asteroid that was headed straight for Earth. The movie was renowned for its extravagant action scenes, but in the process, scientific accuracy was compromised. The asteroid’s size was a major issue since it dwarfed any discovered celestial object in the actual world. 

Both San Andreas and Armageddon have been scientifically proven to be false. However, in contrast to the $474 million movie, Bruce Willis‘ film might look like Nolan’s Interstellar, which consulted actual scientists and theoretical physicists to guarantee the film was as accurate as possible. 

Also Read: Not Dwayne Johnson Or Jason Statham, Expert Reveals Who Are The Best Drivers In Real Life Among Fast And Furious Cast

Advertisement

Scientific Inaccuracy: San Andreas vs. Armageddon 

Dwayne Johnson in San Andreas
Dwayne Johnson in San Andreas

Some movies are made just for your entertainment. These films are utterly unrepresentative of reality. One of these implausible, yet entertaining, films was Armageddon (1998). A real astronaut also weighed in on the accuracy of the Bruce Willis film.

In an interview with Vanity Fair on YouTube, astronaut Chris Hadfield talked about how accurate several space films are. He opened the Armageddon segment with a simple laugh, saying:

“This movie is Armageddon, which is the disastrous end of everything, and I think that’s an appropriate name for this movie.”

Hadfield cited the drill team’s ability to communicate with Mission Control while in space as an example of an unrealistic feature. He claimed:

Advertisement

“Let’s start with the fact that they’re talking to Mission Control in real-time. There’s no lag. How did suddenly time and space change you get instantaneous communication all the way out to this asteroid with no lag?”

Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck in Armageddon
Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck in Armageddon

Meanwhile, the amount of actual scientific territory that San Andreas actually stood on was also questioned. Although some of the action in The Rock’s film was accurate, there were moments that seemed to straddle the line between reality and fantasy.

Thomas Jordan, the former director of the Southern California Earthquake Center, said in an interview with the Los Angeles Times in 2015 that while he was consulted, not much of his advice was shown in the film:

“I gave them free advice, some of which they took … but much of which they didn’t. Magnitude 9’s are too big for the San Andreas, and it can’t produce a big tsunami.”

Anne Hathaway in Interstellar
Anne Hathaway in Interstellar

The intense action and gripping narratives of Armageddon and San Andreas captivate audiences even though they may not be the pinnacles of scientific accuracy. However, Interstellar, directed by Christopher Nolan, shows that a movie can successfully combine scientific realism with an engaging story to transport viewers on an incredible space voyage.

Advertisement

While Amazon Prime Video has Interstellar available, FuboTV is streaming Armageddon. And you can watch San Andreas on VIX.

Also Read: One Underrated $428M Thriller is Proof Dwayne Johnson, Not Millie Bobby Brown, Should Lead Godzilla and MonsterVerse

Avatar

Written by Siddhika Prajapati

Articles Published: 1470

Between everyday normalities and supernatural abnormalities, Siddhika Prajapati finds the story in everything. Literature Honors Graduate and Post-Graduated in Journalism (from Delhi University), her undying need to deduce the extraordinary out of simplicity makes her a vibrant storyteller.

Serving as a Senior Entertainment Writer at Fandom Wire and having written over 1400 pieces, Siddhika has also worked with multiple clients and projects over the years, including Indian Express, India Today, and Outlook Group.

Who knows, maybe your next favorite persona on the screen will be crafted by her.