Years before Sam Raimi’s ground-breaking Spider-Man trilogy made it to the big screen and forever revolutionized the comic book superhero genre, there were several other iterations of the tale with several other filmmakers and actors associated with the project. One of them was James Cameron, who was eager to have a more mature and grounded take on the web-slinger’s live-action debut film.
Associated and contacted by Carolco Pictures, Cameron originally wanted Leonardo DiCaprio in the lead before the studio went bankrupt. However, if the filmmaker’s version of the movie had made it through, we would have gotten Spider-Man fighting two different Marvel villains in his first film.
James Cameron’s Spider-Man Movie Would Have Featured Two Different Marvel Villains
Years before Sam Raimi and Tobey Maguire‘s epic Spider-Man movie was released in theatres, James Cameron was offered the movie. While financial issues and studio bankruptcy prevented the movie from ever being made, the Titanic director had two different versions of the script.
The script was focused on the origin story of how Peter Parker became the acclaimed web-slinger. Yet, this iteration of the film had Electro and Sandman as the main villains of the unmade movie.
Electro, named Carlton Strand, was supposed to be an extremely wealthy businessman who became the iconic Marvel villain in a lightning incident. Sandman, named Boyd, was just a maintenance man, who after getting in contact with a secret military project experiment ended up getting his sand powers.
Electro and Sandman, greatly differing from their comic book origins, would have made their live-action debut way earlier than The Amazing Spider-Man 2 and Spider-Man 3, respectively. While it would have been interesting to see Camron’s take on the movie, it certainly differed from Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man a great deal (via Screen Rant and Fandom Wiki).
How James Cameron’s Spider-Man Was Different Than Sam Raimi’s
It is hard to imagine a director who has made movies like Terminator, Avatar, and Aliens making a Spider-Man movie. Yet, that is what nearly happened, and the movie was way different than Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man trilogy.
Cameron, in his book Tech Noir: The Art of James Cameron, shared in extensive detail how his Marvel flick was supposed to be and even referred to it as the greatest movie I never made. Furthermore, while speaking to Screen Crush about the movie, he remarked,
“I think it would’ve been very different… I wanted to make something that had a kind of gritty reality to it… I wanted to do something that would have been more in the vein of Terminator and Aliens, that you buy into the reality right away. So you’re in a real world, you’re not in some mythical Gotham City… A guy gets bitten by a spider. He turns into this kid with these powers… I wanted to ground it in reality and ground it in universal human experience.”
States Cameron while exclaiming that his script was written with the blessings of Stan Lee and the story was set in New York. While Cameron tried several times to persuade studios to buy the movie, the rights, and other complexities prevented the movie from being made.
And now we can only wonder what the film would have looked like, reminiscing something that we almost had.
Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man trilogy can be streamed on Disney+.
