‘Abuse Has No Gender, Johnny Depp is the Victim’: Internet Blasts Amber Heard Supporters for Using Circumstantial Evidence To Claim Depp Doctored Injury Photo, Used Revenge P*rn

Featured Video

In the aftermath of the highly publicized and televised Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard defamation trial of 2022, the mountain of evidence that had been presented, examined, and analyzed by the court proved insufficient still to some of the followers of the two celebrities. The lawsuit which is being appealed by the defendant, Amber Heard, is now set to take place in yet to be appointed court date and it tackles the initial verdict that had found Heard guilty of the charges of defamation filed against her.

Johnny Depp defamation case against ex-wife Amber Heard continues, in Fairfax, Virginia
Johnny Depp listens in the courtroom as the trial proceeds against ex-wife Amber Heard

Also read: “I Know the Truth About Johnny”: Johnny Depp’s Ex Kate MossSays Testimony That Destroyed Amber Heard Was Needed Since She Believes in “Fairness and Justice”

But now new evidence has surfaced in the form of unsealed court documents as both parties attempt to portray each other in a bad light. Most recently, however, Heard’s supporters have discovered documentation that proves that Depp allegedly attempted to illegally seal parts of evidence that could implicate him during the trial.


Related article: ‘His Fans Truly F*cked Up’: Johnny Depp’s Fans Reportedly Paid $3K to Unseal Court Documents to Fight Amber Heard, Rumored to Have Revealed the Actor Has Erectile Dysfunction and Heard’s Revenge P*rn

The Public Uncovers New Evidence in the Johnny Depp Trial

The defamation trial of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard has occupied the public arena since 2018 as one of the most discussed topics on the internet and several social media platforms. As the entire global demography becomes familiarized with the parties involved and invested in the dramatic twists and emotional revelations of the televised event, more evidence continues to be uncovered even in the aftermath of the jury’s final verdict.

Amber Heard
Amber Heard leaves the Fairfax County Court after the final jury verdict

Also read: In a Tit For Tat Move, Johnny Depp Files Notice to Have $2M Fine Dismissed After Amber Heard Challenges Defamation Trial Verdict


As per reports, the public has officially spent over USD 3000 to unseal court documents that reveal a fairly unsophisticated image of Johnny Depp while fighting the defamation case in Fairfax County, Virginia. The documents are littered with instances of inconsistencies on Depp’s part in providing evidence of abuse and the creation and modification dates on the file metadata appear to be falsified.

Amber Heard
Amber Heard appeals the final jury verdict after an appalling loss in the defamation trial

Also read: ‘Are We Supposed to Feel Sorry For Her?’: Johnny Depp Fans Blast Amber Heard After Legal Team Proves Targeted Online Hate Campaign Against Her During Defamation Trial

Public Opinion Swayed in the Aftermath of New Evidence

As the publicized documents reveal, Johnny Depp uses Amber Heard’s previous job associations as evidence to portray her in a pre-conceived negative light. The document reads that “Evidence of the following irrelevant personal matters should be excluded” and the matters listed in the paragraph that follows include “nude pictures of Amber Heard”“Amber’s brief stint as an exotic dancer years before she met Mr. Depp and Mr. Depp attempting to frivolously and maliciously suggest or imply that Ms. Heard was at one time an escort”.


The document now finds Johnny Depp as its target by portraying him as petty and playing dirty and the public once again finds itself divided over the issue as Johnny Depp’s supporters counter the unsealed documents with their own damning discoveries.




Related article: ‘The Verdict Was Likely Impacted’: Legal Experts Across the World Defend Amber Heard After Aquaman Actress Declares Bankruptcy, Claim She Can Win Over a Technicality

The divided opinions on the internet have been swaying to and fro between supporting a man courageous enough to be vulnerable in the public eye and a woman whose voice is being silenced by a man who holds more sway over the public. Even as both sides fight it out, delivering a litany of reasoned arguments supporting each case, the socio-political impacts of the publicized trial have wreaked enough havoc among the present generation of social media influencers by concentrating their efforts on either mocking or praising either party while ignoring larger societal issues at stake.

Source: Twitter


Written by Diya Majumdar

Articles Published: 1605

With a degree in Literature from Miranda House, Diya Majumdar now has over 1600 published articles on FandomWire. Her passion and profession both include dissecting the world of cinema while being a liberally opinionated person with an overbearing love for music, Monet, and Van Gogh.