“It didn’t work out”: After Trying To Kick Out Tom Cruise, Paramount Deliberately Set Up Mission Impossible 7 To Fail By Ignoring One Key Advice That Doomed Franchise

After Trying To Kick Out Tom Cruise, Paramount Deliberately Set Up Mission Impossible 7 To Fail By Ignoring One Key Advice That Doomed Franchise
Featured Video

Paramount Studios may have milked their Mission: Impossible franchise a little too much over the years, but it has been coming to light that they may not have a very good relationship with the lead – Tom Cruise.

Advertisement

The Wall Street Journal back in 2006 reported that Viacom, Paramount’s parent company, had been facing troubles with Mission: Impossible III due to Tom Cruise’s problematic behavior.

Tom Cruise as Ethan Hunt
Tom Cruise as Ethan Hunt

Before Philippe Dauman took over as the CEO of Viacom in 2016, the late Sumner Redstone headed the conglomerate. He made it public that the studio was not happy with how the film had performed.

Advertisement

Redstone was registered as one of the most credible media magnates of his time and his intent to let Cruise go came off as a surprise to most fans.

Read more: Tom Cruise’s Mission Impossible 7, Which Was Supposed to be Barbenheimer’s Bane, Gets Disappointing Box Office Update

What Issue Does Paramount Really Have With Tom Cruise?

Mission: Impossible II earned the studios a whopping $549M. The third installment, though, wrapped it up at $399M in global sales. 

Advertisement

This infuriated Sumner Redstone to the point that he blamed Tom Cruise for complicating the franchise and messing with it creatively, owing to the latter’s Scientology connections.

The late Sumner Redstone
The late Sumner Redstone, Ex-CEO – Viacom

Redstone said to Wall Street Journal,

“We don’t think that someone who effectuates creative suicide and costs the company revenue should be on the lot. His recent conduct has not been acceptable to Paramount.”

Vanity Fair in 2005 reported that Tom Cruise had lost his ‘marbles’ as he had been promoting Scientology over and beyond. Redstone added, “He had never behaved this way before, he really went over the top.”

Advertisement

Read more: “We f–ked up”: Tom Cruise’s Mission Impossible 7 Director Took a Page Out of Zack Snyder’s Justice League to Shoot One Key Scene in $291M Sequel

Was Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One Sabotaged On Purpose?

Setting the release date for July 12, only eight days before the release of Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer and Greta Gerwig’s Barbie turned out to be a big setback for the studios.

Tom Cruise
Tom Cruise

But, was this a mistake or a deliberate move? Christopher Nolan has, for a long time now, championed the IMAX format like no other. Paramount’s decision, according to Bruce Markoe who heads the post-production department at IMAX, to be stubborn with the release date cost them big money. Markoe stated to Forbes,

Advertisement

“We wanted to get them to move it, to create more time to play both in IMAX to the full extent that they both wanted, but it didn’t work out. That’s not our decision – that’s the studios.”

Suggested: Scientology Reportedly Became Tom Cruise’s Secret Service, Destroyed College Student’s Plan to Humiliate Mission Impossible 7 Star During $398M Movie Premiere

Whether the move was a retaliatory action against Tom Cruise or just a bad business call, we can only look at the patterns that led to the film underperforming at the box office and speculate. It has so far clocked $452M in global sales.

Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part Two is on track for a June 28, 2024 release.

Advertisement

Source: Collider, The Wall Street Journal

Avatar

Written by Ojaswi Chaudhary

Articles Published: 265

Extremely passionate about a great story since the little guy was 8. He has lived through nothing short of almost 300 of Hollywood's finest pieces of work, and is now creating some of his own here at FandomWire. He loves to make time for a good book and a good meal.